A- de 2016
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
✓Claimant John Fernando Huertas Gomez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por extemporánea
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia SU217/16.
El peticionario adujo que nunca tuvo conocimiento del contenido de la recomendación de la Junta Asesora de la Policía Nacional que avaló su llamado a calificar servicios, por lo que la Corte, al confirmar el fallo atacado en sede de tutela, violó su derecho fundamental al debido proceso.
Alegó, que la providencia impugnada desconoce la jurisprudencia de la propia Corporación relacionada con la materia que indica que todas las actuaciones de retiro deben ser motivadas
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. RECHAZAR por extemporaneo el incidente de nulidad presentado por el senor John Fernando Huertas Gomez contra la sentencia SU-217 de 2016.
- Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.